Why NFT is the best hydroponic system beginners should avoid

linkedinrssyoutubeinstagram
image_pdfimage_print

Nutrient Film Technique (NFT) is a hydroponic growing system that uses flat channels with nutrient solution flow – in the form of a thin film at the bottom of the channels – in order to grow plants. An NFT system will maintain maximum oxygen exposure to plant roots and a consistent nutrient supply, providing ideal conditions for plants. However, while NFT systems are extremely popular in large commercial operations, small scale growers and hobbyists rarely use them with the same success. Why is it that professionals like NFT systems so much, but yields decrease when small scale growers try it?

Greenhouse products and hydroponic system for growing plants and vegetables  in a nutrient solution | Gestión de Compras
A commercial hydroponic NFT system

The fragility of NFT

The NFT setup provides an ideal set of conditions that is hard to maintain without significant effort. These systems demand control over a large variety of variables. This includes the flow of nutrient solution, the temperature of the air inside the channels, the chemistry of the solution and the sterilization of the nutrient solution. These are also all critical failure points for an NFT system. It is common for NFT setups to fail because of power failures, roots clogging channels, diseases spreading like wildfire, solutions becoming too hot or too cold, etc. The more things you have to control, the easier it is to fail to control one of those properly.

Commercial growers will generally have a lot of people and resources devoted to the monitoring of all these conditions and adequate standard operation procedures will generally be in place to address all these potential points of failure. Large growers often start from turn-key solutions with already well established expectations for issues and their solutions, something that small growers generally lack. By design, NFT requires a lot of planning for contingencies, small growers and amateur growers don’t do this as well as large companies.

Decision skills

One of the most critical aspects of NFT systems is that the time between decisions and consequences is quite fast. If roots grow to the point where a channel is being significantly obstructed and a grower does not realize there is a problem and acts fast, then the crop will be very negatively affected. In one crop I consulted with, a 24 hour delay in noticing the start of a fungal disease, generate a massive loss of plants in the crop. The solution was not being adequately sterilized in recirculation, which was a huge oversight and failure point for the crop. Thankfully, this grower was producing lettuce – which is easier to recover from as the crop cycle is short – but this can be devastating for a flowering plant grower, where crop cycles are much longer.

Pythium myriotylum caused root rot disease of lettuce grown in... |  Download Scientific Diagram
NFT rapidly spreads disease across plants. Taken from this paper.

This ability to find problems fast and solve them quickly requires a lot of focus and attention. Small scale growers are generally distracted by many other aspects of the crop, from financials and distribution in small scale commercial operations, to just regular life and normal jobs in family setups. For this reason, these problems generally go unattended in these crops, which leads to problems from lower yields, to total crop failure.

A lot of small problems

Perhaps most insidious, is the fact that many problems in an NFT setup can go completely unnoticed during a crop cycle, eating at yields before they are apparent. While commercial growers will have expectations set by consultants and system builders, the small scale grower will have no idea that certain things need to be looked at within a crop cycle.

For example, channel length can be critical in NFT setups, as plants that receive the feed at the start of a channel can deplete a solution from key nutrients by the time it reaches the end of the channel. This issue can go on through an entire crop cycle without the grower ever noticing anything except reduced yields. This might lead a grower to think that the NFT system is somehow leading to lower yields, while it is their particular implementation of NFT and not NFT as a whole that leads to worse results.

Small scale growers tend to have less time and resources, so they will tend to ignore problems that are not very obvious. The sum of all these problems will tend to cause a substantial erosion of yields. In my experience, small scale growers will, on average, achieve much better results with systems that are more forgiving than with a potentially more productive but substantially more complicated setup.

Cleaning Hydroponic Channels
Plants in NFT setups can grow huge roots that can easily clog drains or prevent proper flow across the channel. Trimming roots when this happens is fundamental for system survival.

Why large scale growers use it

You might be thinking, why do commercial growers bother with NFT then? If it is so complex and prone to failure, then why in the world would you choose a system like this? The answer, is that NFT can be a very high yielding, low cost and reproducible alternative at a medium to large commercial scale. It avoids one huge cost – which is the purchase and labor costs associated with media – and focuses all energy into the production of plants. An NFT crop is also much more efficient from a water and fertilizer usage perspective (1). This means that, for a large scale commercial grower, dealing with the complexities of an NFT system is preferable to dealing with the additional costs, labor and inefficiencies of a media based system. Having to handle way less nutrient solution volume, no media and getting basically the same or superior yield, is a no-brainer for commercial growers.

A medium to large scale greenhouse will have people dedicated to growing, whose main job will be to monitor the crop and ensure that it is performing as specified by the manufacturer. With more than 70 years of experience in the setup of hydroponic crops, many companies offer turn-key solutions that have clearly set management procedures and outcomes for several different plant species. This is especially true for leafy greens, cucumbers, tomatoes, peppers and strawberries, all very commonly produced using NFT systems.

What should the little guy do then

For commercial growers, the benefits of NFT often overcome its disadvantages. However, for the small grower looking for more reliable production of crops, even if it means at lower fertilizer and water use efficiency, it often doesn’t make sense to go with NFT setups. For small growers who want to avoid media, deep water culture (DWC) offers an easier and more reliable alternative. For those wanting to grow with lower starting costs, open media-based systems give the best success rates, even if this implies significantly lower efficiency from almost all points of view.

If this is your first try at hydroponics or if you want to go with a small scale commercial setup, my advice would be to go with a system that is more forgiving and that you have the time and skill level to properly manage. Once you master these systems, you can try NFT, but bear in mind that your initial results might be worse than what you were doing before, just because the level of skill and knowledge required to successfully manage an NFT setup is substantially higher.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedin

6 Comments

  • Steve Hovland
    April 19, 2021 @ 7:41 am

    I tried NFT with 3″ tubes. The roots clogged them, the Sun heated them, the fell over.

    DWC is definitely better, even at larger scale.

    If the power fails or pumps fail in NFT everything quickly dies. DWC is more resilient.

    I think the 3′ by 6′ flood trays are a good module size for DWC.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOlUwQcO0sM

    • admin
      April 19, 2021 @ 7:44 am

      Thanks for your comment! NFT is indeed much harder to get right compared with DWC and the benefits are, in my opinion, not attractive enough at small scales.

      • John Walker
        June 19, 2021 @ 11:43 pm

        Do these concerns and complications still apply to very short cycle crops like microgreens? I’m a growing one man operation with the need for some automation and interest in getting out of growing in soil. The coir I’ve tried has had horribly anemic performance and still requires manual watering 2xdaily.

        • admin
          June 20, 2021 @ 9:29 am

          Thanks for commenting! An NFT system is overkill for something like microgreens. I did microgreen production using coco coir matts, you can do a basic ebb & flow system using a flood table, with excellent results. If you want to replace soil, make sure you have a nutrient solution that is able to replace the nutrition your micro greens would be getting from the soil. Also make sure you sterilize or at least sanitize your media before using it to avoid fungal issues.

  • Nate N
    March 3, 2022 @ 9:56 pm

    How do you sterilize the water going back into the system? Doesn’t it all recirculate throughout?

    • admin
      March 4, 2022 @ 9:27 am

      Generally a UV system placed immediately after the pump that goes to the plants ensures that the freshly fed solution is always sanitized.

Leave a Reply to John Walker Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.